Discussion 36 to Meditation 38
Fails completely to address the challenge
by: JT
To add to this exchange of views (or any other,) please use the Contact form. This discussion has been continued.
For someone so desirous of receiving a doctorate from IUN, you seem remarkably inept in meeting the basic requirement. In my response to your earlier unsubstantiated requests for a doctorate, I stated:
- Read carefully so you know what is expected, - and
- please be original - there is no point in repeating the arguments already submitted in the discussion section for each of the challenges. Also, please be clear using proper grammatical sentence structure. And take your time and get what you want to say right.
Now, for this particular challenge, the requirement was:
- what is needed is contemporary documentary evidence,... Contemporary means, for the purpose of this challenge, during the purported life of Christ, and that is the period of about 7 BC to 33 AD. And I don't want secondary and tertiary references. We need to know what the primary source documents are,... etc.
I'm sorry, but you've totally failed to meet that challenge. You also apparently failed to read the existing discussion items where these tired "proofs" that you provide are exposed as proving nothing about the actual existence of Jesus. I'm not going waste my time repeating what has already been said to debunk your sources in the earlier discussion - you can find that out by actually taking the time to read the discussion yourself - if you can be bothered.
Instead of flooding me with articles on numerous issues - most of which remain to be considered for publication - I suggest you take your time and think about what you are submitting. Send in less - but make it better written and more importantly, better thought out. And if you are responding to one of our challenges, make sure you understand what you are responding to.