Discussion 2 to Meditation 223
Re: Bishop Spong's 12 Theses
by JT
To add to this discussion (or any other,) please use the Contact form. This exchange of views has been continued.Thank you for your question.
I will start off by pointing out that the list of Theses as originally published in Meditation 223 was based on a newspaper article on a speech by Bishop Spong. I have now revised the Meditation to reflect the wording as published originally by Spong himself.
So, the first thesis, which you questioned, was:
"Theism (the idea of a personal God) is dead, so most theological "God-talk" today is meaningless."
And the correct wording is:
"Theism, as a way of defining God, is dead. So most theological God-talk is today meaningless. A new way to speak of God must be found."
I don't know if that helps you decide what the thesis truly means.
My own interpretation would be that if theism does not define God, then the logical alternative - if your view still demands a god - is deism. That, however, may not be what Spong intended.
My understanding of Spong's idea of Christianity is that it is based on the example of the life, works, and word of Christ - rather than the mystical aspects.
However, I don't expect that I will write giving my interpretation of Bishop Spong. It will inevitably be different in certain ways from his intentions. I would suggest that anyone interested can find quite a few books by him available at Amazon or B&N. And there is a wealth of websites addressing him and his views - search on "John Shelby Spong" or for the specific issue at hand "12 Theses And Spong" should turn up a lot pro and con.
I would welcome others writing in with their views on the theses.